Difference between revisions of "Real Numbers and their Decimal Expansions"

From alpha
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 126: Line 126:
*If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (in <math>\frac{10}{3} </math> , <math>3</math> repeats in the quotient and in <math>\frac{1}{7} </math> , <math>142857</math> repeats in the quotient)
*If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (in <math>\frac{10}{3} </math> , <math>3</math> repeats in the quotient and in <math>\frac{1}{7} </math> , <math>142857</math> repeats in the quotient)
* (ii) The number of entries in the repeating string of remainders is less than the divisor (in 10 3 one number repeats itself and the divisor is 3, in 1 7 there are six entries 326451 in the repeating string of remainders and 7 is the divisor). (iii) If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (for 10 3 , 3 repeats in the quotient and for 1 7 , we get the repeating block 142857 in the quotient).
* (ii) The number of entries in the repeating string of remainders is less than the divisor (in 10 3 one number repeats itself and the divisor is 3, in 1 7 there are six entries 326451 in the repeating string of remainders and 7 is the divisor). (iii) If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (for 10 3 , 3 repeats in the quotient and for 1 7 , we get the repeating block 142857 in the quotient).
The above pattern using only the examples above, it is true for all rationals of the form <math>\frac{p}{q} </math> (<math>q \ne 0</math>).
On division of <math>p </math> by <math>q </math>, two main things happen – either the remainder becomes zero or never becomes zero and we get a repeating string of remainders.

Revision as of 22:06, 6 May 2024

Decimal expansion

0.142857..... 3.3333... 0.875
7 1 0 3 1 0 8 7 0
7 9 6 4

3

0 1 0 6 0
2

8

9 5 6

2

0 1 0 4 0
1 4 9 4 0

6

0 1 0 0
5

6

9 Reminders: 6,4,0.

Divisor: 8

4 0 1
3 5 Reminders: 1,1,1,1...

Divisor: 3

5 0
4 9
1
Reminders: 3,2,6,4,5,1,3,2,6,4,5,1...

Divisor: 7

In the above division operation

  • The remainders either become after some stage, or start repeating themselves.
  • The number of entries in the repeating string of remainders is less than the divisor (in , one number repeats itself and the divisor is , in there are six entries in the repeating string of remainders and the divisor is )
  • If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (in , repeats in the quotient and in , repeats in the quotient)
  • (ii) The number of entries in the repeating string of remainders is less than the divisor (in 10 3 one number repeats itself and the divisor is 3, in 1 7 there are six entries 326451 in the repeating string of remainders and 7 is the divisor). (iii) If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (for 10 3 , 3 repeats in the quotient and for 1 7 , we get the repeating block 142857 in the quotient).

The above pattern using only the examples above, it is true for all rationals of the form ().

On division of by , two main things happen – either the remainder becomes zero or never becomes zero and we get a repeating string of remainders.